- The Fold Line Report
- Pages
- Why Visualize?
“Graphical models enable the processing of complex patterns of sensory uncertainty showing the most promise for implementing efficient Bayesian algorithms for high-dimensional estimation problems.”
The human brain's capacity to efficiently search for visual signals amidst cluttered data is a remarkably sophisticated function.
Studies show the visual cortex performs near-optimal Bayesian calculations in a wide variety of tasks, ranging from risky decision making to motor control...and we do such risk calculations instantly.
Imagine driving a Tesla that is autonomously attempting to navigate some lifesaving maneuver.
In such split-second decisions, a Tesla’s “AI” is attempting what your brain already accomplishes instantly and perfectly in life-and-death circumstances (perhaps Mom in the back seat) — getting it right over-and-over without so much as a second thought.
The visual cortex is a powerhouse
Our brain engages in near-optimal Bayesian calculations across a spectrum of tasks, from high-stakes decision-making to the nuanced control of motor functions. (Good luck programing your robot to catch a baseball as you blow-out the tech budget on endless trials of them trying to ‘get it right’.
Our brains already have this existing capability and it isn't just remarkable; it's instantaneous.
But, there is something even more fascinating about this: The brain's ability to calculate risks is significantly enhanced by the introduction of ‘Uncertainty’.
The Catalyst of Uncertainty
Contrary to intuitive thought, ‘Uncertainty’ doesn't hinder your brain's decision-making prowess...it enhances it.
Whenever the stakes are high and accuracy is non-negotiable, our brains’ risk assessment capabilities kick into overdrive like Superman, sharpened by the mere presence of ‘Uncertainty’.
The more uncertain the situation, the more refined our brain's calculations.
When uncertainty is low, complacency leads to miscalculation. However, in life-and-death situations, where accuracy is mortally critical, human senses intensify enhancing our risk assessment capabilities.
An Illustration
Imagine hiking in a forest and approaching a stream that requires a jumping over.
To decide, you would likely estimate the stream's width and compare it with your perceived jumping ability.
For instance, if you're confident in jumping 2 meters and the stream appears to be 1.9 meters wide, your quant might advise you to 'go for it.
However, this approach overlooks ‘The Uncertainty Factor': the inherent imprecision and natural flaws in your sensory and motor estimates.
It’s more realistic for you to say that you think you can jump the 2m…and that you think the stream is 1.9m wide. And what if the stream is filled with, let’s say, piranhas?
Insight
When confronted with uncertainty, our brain leans on Bayesian optimality and will thus balance probabilities slightly differently than the raw quantitative output typically guiding a quant’s decisions.
Behavioral studies have confirmed that humans who tackle risk estimation problems visually not only take uncertainty into account, but do so in a way that is nearly Bayes optimal.
Wolpert, D.M. et al. (1995) An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269, 1880–1882
Lee, T.S. and Mumford, D. (2003) Hierarchical Bayesian inference in the visual cortex. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 20, 1434– 1448
It Feels Like Intuition
What often feels like intuition—those gut feelings about when to act or hold back—is your brain's Bayesian calculations at work. Processing data, assessing probabilities, and navigating uncertainties: your brain does all this within the framework of Bayesian optimality.
The result is a decision-making process that's not just reactive — but profoundly anticipatory, and guided by a deep, often unconscious computational rigor.
Our brain's handling of uncertainty reveals not just a capacity for complex computation, but a profound adaptability in the flux of life's uncertainties — employing Bayesian principles to navigate, decide, and ultimately, survive.
The Fold Line Report bridges a gap between such abstract computational theory and practical, actionable insight underscoring a powerful premise: the human brain is inherently equipped to manage uncertainty, variability, and noise through Bayesian-like computations.
The principles outlined—weighing the reliability of observations — representing information probabilistically — and propagating uncertainty mirror the analytical strategies employed by The Fold Line Report: leveraging the brain's natural capacities to identify and interpret well-known patterns in cluttered data environments.
The Fold Line Report embodies a practical application of our innate sensory and cognitive processes to financial market analysis.
The Fold Line Report seeks to leverage key insights from research on the brain's inherent capabilities for Bayesian statistical computations and uncertainty processing.
The Fold Line Report provides a practical bridge between this neurological theory and financial market analysis by aligning data outputs to resonate with the brain's uncertainty processing strengths.
The Fold Line Report aims to boost "intuitive feel", pattern perception, and decision making confidence amidst uncertainty.
The Fold Line Report aligns information flows to resonate with commonly shared innate strengths, allowing mastery to emerge from lived understanding.
The Fold Line Report leverages decades of experience with this framework providing a backbone that pure AI/models lack having completely refined skills in navigating market uncertainties.
The Fold Line Report views our brains as "uncertainty engines”. Combined with tacit market insights. The Fold Line Report trains a subscriber's brain on their own innate capacities.